In Search of Sane Pain Policies

In Search of Sane Pain Policies: An Interview With Richard Lawhern, Ph.D. | American Council on Science and Health – By Josh Bloom — November 10, 2016

Richard A. “Red” Lawhern, Ph.D. is a long-time advocate, webmaster, and online research analyst for chronic pain patients, their families and their doctors. He has kindly agreed to be interviewed.

Josh Blum: Pain management is a very complex issue, for example, balancing the legitimate needs of people who suffer from pain with the prevention of others from becoming addicted.

In your opinion, what is the most important facet of this enormous problem?

Richard Lawhern: The most important thing to know about the so-called ” epidemic of prescription opioid overdose deaths” is that it is has been seriously mis-characterized.   

By trying to solve the wrong problems, I believe it is inevitable that government policy on the issue is presently misdirected.

Lost in the current hype and hysteria concerning opioids is the reality that the great majority of chronic pain patients

  1. do not get a euphoric high from the use of opioids, and
  2. do not experience the drug cravings and psycho-social behavior distortions that addicts without chronic pain do.  

Physical dependence and withdrawal symptoms can and do occur, but can be medically managed.  

JB: Do you have statistics to back up your claim?

RL: In recent State-wide studies, a quarter or fewer of overdose victims have a current medical prescription for pain relievers.  

Likewise, many of these deaths also involve alcohol or other drugs.

In the limited number of published studies of addiction in chronic pain patients, risk of opioid abuse disorder varies between 10% and 2%, depending on the study you believe.  

Risk of death by overdose is less than one-tenth of one percent — a number exceeded by an order of magnitude in the 440,000 deaths per year due to medical errors in hospital settings, often involving non-opioid prescription drugs.

JB: You seem to hold the CDC in particularly low regard for the current situation. Why is this?

RL: There is ample evidence that the CDC “Guidelines” on prescription of opioids in adult non-cancer chronic pain are deeply flawed by weak or no scientific support, professional bias, errors of methodology and process.

The consultants working group that wrote the guidelines didnt’ include a single Board Certified pain management specialist.  

These folks literally had no first-hand practical knowledge of what they were writing about.

The Guidelines are being enshrined in State laws and regulations which doctors correctly see as a threat to their licenses if they treat patients as individuals.

The only ethically sound response to this collection of atrocities is immediate withdrawal of the Guidelines for a re-write by a group which includes both more stakeholders and more expertise.

JB: What is next? How do you see this playing out over the next few years?

RL: …Lobbying of Congress and State legislatures is needed to demand withdrawal of restrictions on opioids for those who need them, and implementation of more effective policies to interrupt the diversion of opioids into addicts’ hands.

A lot of this advocacy is likely to fall to folks like me, who are not suffering from crushing financial hardship or disabled by pain itself. 

That is certainly true, especially when we are left exhausted by our struggle with pain because we can no longer get effective pain relief.

These are only a few questions I selected from a longer list in the original article: http://acsh.org/news/2016/11/10/search-sane-pain-policies-interview-richard-lawhern-phd-10430

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “In Search of Sane Pain Policies

  1. david becker

    Whilst Red and I have some strong disagreements on pain care, I have to give him credit for a job well done in this interview. Whilst I wanted a revolution in pain care 5 years ago and will still want one 5 years ago- Red has a more pragmatic and “sane” orientation to the current crisesin pain care with regard to opioids.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
    1. Zyp Czyk Post author

      I’m happy that even a compromise resulted in interesting the media in our side of the story.

      I think that’s going to be part of a backlash against all the anti-opioid PROPaganda. It’s been going on so long that they need a new topic to keep their readers interested. Let’s be that new topic!

      Like

      Reply
      1. Dave

        People in pain need to promote a bold new vision and present themselves as more moral and forward looking then big brother. Lets outclass those who treat people in pain as a permanent underclass.

        Liked by 1 person

        Reply

Other thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s