The Pain Industry’s New & Dangerous Fall-Back

Opinion: The Pain Industry’s New & Dangerous FALL-BACK – June 27, 2018 – By Dennis J. Capolongo / Director ENDC

From my perspective, preventative measures to reduce iatrogenic harm should be among the list of alternatives to help reduce opioid consumption.

Recently published reviews authored by outspoken physicians Dr. Martin Makary of John’s Hopkins and Dr. Jana Friedly of the U.W. Medical Center have pointed a finger at an industry that has literally run amok.

Here’s the other nightmare being foisted upon pain patients: “interventional” pain management, with needles and knives that leave patients in even more agony afterward.  

They describe an ever increasing marketing trend that aggressively pushes for needless but lucrative surgeries and other complex procedures that often results in an ever widening path of pain and destruction in their wake.

Up until recently, opioid regiments were the official fall-back treatment plan for post procedure pain.

So, they push you into an invasive “procedure” that isn’t necessary (but, oh, how profitable!) that is supposed to ease your pain so you don’t need opioids anymore, but then the “procedure” itself leaves you in agony that is only treatable by the opioids it was supposed to make unnecessary.

These botched medical procedures by doctors who are often in denial about what they had just done would routinely prescribe heavy opioid dosages while crossing their fingers with regards to their patients final outcomes.

Speak to anyone who has been diagnosed with FBSS (Failed Back Surgery Syndrome) and you’ll get a clearer picture as to how these poor souls were mistreated by a system with very little, if any accountability.

With opiates falling under greater scrutiny, it begs the question, what will these doctors do now without their opioid fall-back plan?

They’re not going to slow down their surgical and procedural schedule, no way!  Instead, they have made a deal with Congressional leaders and the FDA to exploit the opioid crisis as a bargaining chip to increase business even further, a crisis they are partially responsible for apparently by performing many unnecessary surgeries and procedures.

That’s why I was not surprised to see that PROP is a group of mostly “interventional” pain specialists. As opioids become virtually illegal, patients become desperate enough to submit to these completely ineffective procedures.

Doctors make much, much more money doing procedures than they ever could prescribing opioids (though the corrupt ones try to make up for this by running their own drug labs to which they send all their patients for unnecessary drug-tests).

As early as 2012, pain physician societies such as ASIPP and others started lobbying Washington to allow them to use Epidural Steroid Injection (ESI) therapies (what we believe is a high risk and low efficacy invasive procedure) as their NEW FALL-BACK to manage pain from botched surgeries and related procedures.

However they first needed to overcome a few obstacles to get their plan up and running.

The regulations in President Obama’s ACA (the Affordable Care Act) had reduced reimbursements for ESI therapies; (due to their poor efficacy rating) while the treatments now fell under a performance-based payment structure where poor outcomes would reduce their pay even further.

About this time, the opioid crisis had taken the political news agenda by storm. So the interventional pain societies took advantage of this stroke of luck.

They decided to not only push Congress to defeat the ACA in order to fully restore their ESI reimbursement schedule but to allow them to use more expensive Epidural Steroid Injection therapies as their NEW FALL-BACK to botched surgeries and procedures in lieu of opioid regimens!

My biggest fear is that this Bill, if passed, will eventually create an even greater problem to vulnerable patients as ESI’s continue to fall from favor due to their low efficacy and high risk status. 

Harm from ESI’s is exponentially growing along with their increased use, and in some cases necessitates life-long opioid treatments of some kind from intrathecal pump implants to multi-dose managed oral intake.

It should be noted that back in 2013, the FDA’s Safe Use Initiative Team (SUI) recommended the agency investigate the ever growing reports of severe harm from ESI treatments that were now flooding the agency’s MedWatch alert database, especially after the fungal meningitis outbreak had killed many people the previous year. So in 2014, the FDA appointed an advisory panel to do just that.

Thanks to the advocates and families who presented to the FDA’s AADPAC advisory panel in 2014, they voted 15-7 to Contraindicate (ban) ESI’s at the C level, and to post new strict Warnings on the labels of all injectable steroids when used via the epidural route.

…the makers of the most popular ESI steroid Depo-Medrol® (Methylprednisolone Acetate) is now asking the FDA to “Contraindicate” their product “for epidural administration” (at all levels) in their Global-Core-DataSheet for the drug due to increasing reports of severe harm and death.

Pfizer is also requesting for a “MUST-NOT USE via the epidural route Black-Box Warning to further drive their point that this drug is dangerous when used in this unlicensed way.

Sadly, the FDA has unlawfully rejected Pfizer’s request. In fact they have repeatedly rejected these and other numerous calls to alert the general public along with the medical establishment despite multiple interventions by drug manufacturers, FDA advisory panels, SUI teams, concerned physicians and patient advocacy groups.

Without any procedural oversight of the pain management industry, and without any strict regulations to help prevent aggressive marketing for needless but lucrative surgeries and procedures, especially with an FDA that’s embedded by industry insiders, I fear this mess will only get worse before it gets better.

The evidence is clear, the FDA is obviously placing the interests of the Pain Management Industry, a $300Billion* dollar a year behemoth above public safety.

Aabout the Author: The EDNC is a patient advocacy collaborative comprised mostly of business professionals who believe they were seriously harmed by the off-label epidural administration of Pfizer’s Depo-Medrol and other similar steroid suspensions. As patient advocates, they work on behalf of those whose lives have been seriously affected from the severe adverse effects of intraspinal procedures and therapies. Dennis Capolongo has been its Director since 2002.

4 thoughts on “The Pain Industry’s New & Dangerous Fall-Back

  1. canarensis

    I’ve had SI joint steroid shots 6 times (3/side) with 2/3 providing no relief, the last set making it worse. I wouldn’t go under the needle or knife under any circumstance, especially considering my main non-migraine pain arose from nerve damage after esophageal surgery in 2001. No, no, a thousand times no. It’s criminal that they’re trying to force desperate patients into procedures that have a high likelihood of leaving them worse off than before, all to avoid phantom addiction problems. Insane.

    That said, did you see this story/study?

    I can’t decide if I’ve got brain fog or the summary isn’t clear. I read the summary as saying that hyperalgia doesn’t occur. But the statement “Our results indicate that long term opioid therapy does not effectively manage patient pain intensity any more effectively than not receiving long-term opioid therapy…” makes it sound like using opioids is pointless because they don’t “cure” the pain (i.e. the pain isn’t better after you stop). That’s not the point of taking them; they’re for reducing the pain while you take them, not making it go away after you stop. Am I missing something?

    O’ Oracle* of Pain, can you do your usual excellent job of turning mush into coherence? Sorry to dump more work on you, but if you’re looking for a new subject….. (extreme apologies if you’ve already addressed this study; I’m going thru your posts, but in a somewhat slow fashion).

    (sounds like an Irish name)

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Zyp Czyk Post author

      Yes, I saw that and it makes me feel so helplessly angry that I can’t even comment on it yet. How can they “prove” something I know/experience not to be true?

      Again, they are taking about “averages” when it could be that individual patients either respond very well (as I do) or barely at all.

      But almost by definition, those that truly don’t need opioids and are fine without them probably weren’t having severe pain to begin with. Chronic opioids might only be effective for certain kinds of pain – and that’s apparently the kind that we have.

      All these studies treat pain as one single entity arising from one generic syndrome of “central sensitization”. That’s not very smart because it’s so unrealistic.

      All these studies are funded only to “confirm researcher bias”, so we’re not going to see any real pain research anytime soon.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Pingback: Joint Injections: Are They Worth the Risk? | EDS and Chronic Pain News & Info

Other thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.