Treating chronic pain can restore normal brain function

Effective Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain in Humans Reverses Abnormal Brain Anatomy and Function | Journal of Neuroscience – Free full-text article – May 2011

Though also not new, this study is a follow up on an earlier post: Brain abnormalities are Consequence Not Cause of pain (2009). The article below contains dozens of links to further information.

Abstract:

Chronic pain is associated with reduced brain gray matter and impaired cognitive ability.

In this longitudinal study, we assessed whether neuroanatomical and functional abnormalities were reversible and dependent on treatment outcomes.    

We acquired MRI scans from chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients before (n = 18) and 6 months after (spine surgery or facet joint injections; n = 14) treatment.

In addition, we scanned 16 healthy controls, 10 of which returned 6 months after the first visit.

We performed cortical thickness analysis on structural MRI scans, and subjects performed a cognitive task during the functional MRI

We compared patients and controls, as well as patients before versus after treatment.

After treatment, patients had increased cortical thickness in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), which was thinner before treatment compared with controls. Increased DLPFC thickness correlated with the reduction of both pain and physical disability.

Additionally, increased thickness in

  • primary motor cortex was associated specifically with reduced physical disability, and
  • right anterior insula was associated specifically with reduced pain.

Left DLPFC activity during an attention-demanding cognitive task was abnormal before treatment, but normalized following treatment.

These data indicate that functional and structural brain abnormalities—specifically in the left DLPFC—are reversible, suggesting that treating chronic pain can restore normal brain function in humans.

Introduction

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is the most prevalent form of chronic pain, and it is the most common reason for disability in the working-age population (Rapoport et al., 2004).

CLBP has been associated with abnormal brain anatomy and function.

When compared with pain-free controls, individuals with CLBP have been shown to have reductions in cortical gray matter in the

  • bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC),
  • thalamus,
  • brainstem,
  • primary somatosensory cortex (S1), and
  • posterior parietal cortex

(Apkarian et al., 2004b; Schmidt-Wilcke et al., 2006; Buckalew et al., 2008).

In addition to CLBP, cortical abnormalities occur in a wide variety of other chronic pain conditions, such as chronic headache, arthritis, and fibromyalgia (for review, see May, 2008).

Several studies have also indicated abnormal cortical function in people with CLBP (Giesecke et al., 2004; Baliki et al., 2008; Lloyd et al., 2008; Kobayashi et al., 2009; Tagliazucchi et al., 2010).

Evidence from pain neuroimaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation studies has linked the DLPFC to

There is evidence that some people with chronic pain also have cognitive impairment (Kewman et al., 1991; Eccleston, 1995; Lorenz et al., 1997; Park et al., 2001; Dick et al., 2002, 2003;Apkarian et al., 2004a; Harman and Ruyak, 2005; Veldhuijzen et al., 2006; Lee et al., 2010).

Findings from a recent study in healthy individuals suggested that this cognitive impairment could be a result of the demands that pain puts on cognitive brain networks: cognitive load-related activity was enhanced by pain, and even pain alone activated this cognitive network (Seminowicz and Davis, 2007b).

In that study, acute noxious stimuli were administered while healthy subjects performed a task. Here, instead of noxious stimuli, we presumed that the ongoing nature of chronic pain would alter brain activity during cognitive performance.

Thus, we hypothesized that chronic pain would be associated with relatively greater recruitment of the cognitive brain network activated during an attention-demanding task.

We performed a longitudinal anatomical and functional MRI study with CLBP patients and healthy controls to

(1) identify structural and functional differences between controls and patients before treatment,

(2) determine whether these differences were reversed following treatment, and

(3) establish whether these changes were linked to the amount of treatment-related reduction of pain and disability.

Results

  • CLBP is associated with decreased cortical thickness in multiple brain areas
  • Treating CLBP leads to increased cortical thickness in the left DLPFC
  • Recovery of cortical thickness is independent of depression
  • The extent of thickness increase in left DLPFC and other areas is associated with effectiveness of treatment
  • CLBP patients have abnormal left DLPFC activation during cognitive challenge, despite normal performance on the task

Discussion

Our findings provide strong evidence that pain-related neuroanatomical and functional changes are reversible with effective treatment.

Furthermore, we have provided evidence for a link between regional brain function and anatomy.

The left DLPFC was thinner and was activated abnormally in patients before treatment relative to controls; after treatment, the same region became thicker and also functioned more similarly to controls on a cognitive task. Previous research has shown altered brain anatomy in chronic pain conditions

Treating CLBP results in increased cortical thickness in left DLPFC.

Recent studies suggest that changes in brain gray matter can occur when pain is eliminated (Obermann et al., 2009; Rodriguez-Raecke et al., 2009; Gwilym et al., 2010). The current study extends those findings to changes in cortical thickness, which is a quantitative measure that can be compared between studies, unlike gray matter density.

Furthermore, we demonstrate that

the left DLPFC got thicker in each CLBP patient who improved after treatment, and that

the amount of neuroanatomical recovery depended on the amount of improvement in clinical outcome measures in each patient.

The patients in our sample received treatment interventions that targeted the presumed pain generators within the musculoskeletal system (i.e., spinal structures).

Thus, it seems that the development of chronic pain can lead to prefrontal cortical thinning, and—from the present results—that reducing pain can lead to prefrontal cortical thickening.

It is also evident that anxiety and depression are closely related to these changes, although in both the case of the rat study and the present study, affective measures alone did not explain the differences in cortical volume or thickness.

The reduction of incoming nociceptive inputs from peripheral structures likely accounts for part of the improvement in pain and pain-related disability.

This is a fancy way to say that when the pain signals stopped, the patients improved.

Treating CLBP results in normalization of cognitive task-related brain activity in left DLPFC

Future directions

Several important problems remain for future research to resolve.

  • First, are the findings here specific to CLBP, or are they replicable across different chronic pain conditions, or even across other chronic diseases such as posttraumatic stress disorder, chronic fatigue syndrome, or obesity?
  • Second, to what aspect of the treatment were the changes in DLPFC related?

It is quite possible that a strong placebo effect, as is often seen in chronic pain (Seeley, 1990; Hoffman et al., 2005), contributed to the improved outcomes observed in this study.

Another important question is as follows: Are the changes in left DLPFC and elsewhere related to pain modulation?

If recovery of DLPFC thickness and/or function is necessary for pain relief, then the DLPFC may be a target for treatment. In fact, it has already shown some promise in studies of short- and long-term analgesia from repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the prefrontal cortex

A previous study indicated that the impact of CLBP on the brain may vary by pain type (i.e., neuropathic vs non-neuropathic) (Apkarian et al., 2004b).

In the current study, the experimental group reported chronic axial low back pain, chronic radicular pain, or both. Although this strategy did not allow for differentiation between nociceptive and neuropathic pain, the sample was representative of the mixed etiology of CLBP in the general population.

Furthermore, different treatment interventions (surgery or facet joint block) were selected to maximize the likelihood of pain relief for each individual patient as would be typical in a clinical setting.

Rather than attempting to differentiate between differences in pain etiology or treatment selection, the primary outcome measures were posttreatment improvement in pain and disability. Future studies could be conducted to further dissect the impact of pain types and specific treatments on brain structure and function.

Conclusions

In summary, we have shown that the left DLPFC, which was thinner and had abnormal cognitive task-related activity in CLBP patients before treatment compared with pain-free controls, became significantly thicker and had normal activity following treatment, and that the degree of recovery in thickness depended on the extent of the patient’s improvement after treatment.

Our results imply that treating chronic pain can restore normal brain function.

Wow – they’re saying that all of us with chronic pain have abnormal brain function.

Well. in my case, I believe it’s true. Constant inescapable pain has, over decades, turned my brain to mush.

It began when I was still working; I started making more and more mistakes. I’m lucky I was forced out before I created a real disaster… and I used to be such a techie whiz-kid.

2 thoughts on “Treating chronic pain can restore normal brain function

  1. Mavis Johnson

    This is, from 2011. No research has been done since, even though they could have used it to create indicators to prove that people actually had pain. It appears that there was no research funding for this kind of research. The industries that fund research, clearly want pain to remain in the subjective realm, for deniability and profitability. Peddling placebos, medications and devices that only work if the patient believes, has been incredibly profitable. They don’t want to create a clear distinction between people with pain, and the addicted either. They want to leave it up to opinion and alternate facts, from years of media misinformation, and industry propaganda.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

Other thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.